HELPMATE.SITE

History essay rubric college

  • 05.02.2019

Extremely well organized, with a clear introduction, argument, and conclusion. Well written in appropriate standard English; few grammatical errors or colloquialisms. Good analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis demonstrates understanding of all sides of a question as appropriate , though may be unevenly developed.

Good grasp of general historical issues raised by topic. Several specific examples demonstrate good knowledge of relevant history. Well organized, with an introduction, argument, and conclusion. Clearly written in appropriate standard English; some grammatical errors or colloquialisms. Analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis adequate but unevenly developed.

Some grasp of general historical issues raised by topic, though some significant issues may be omitted. Some specific examples demonstrate knowledge of relevant history; some clearly relevant examples omitted. Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences. Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around.

Few or weak transitions, and there are many paragraphs without topic sentences. Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent.

Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. No evidence structure or organization. Examples support thesis and fit within paragraph. Excellent integration of quoted material into sentences. Factual information is incorporated. Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support point or may appear where inappropriate. Quotations are integrated well into sentences.

Some factual information is incorporated. Examples support some points. Quotations may be poorly integrated into sentences. There may not be a clear point.

Moderate amount of factual information is incorporated. Very few or weak examples and factual information. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no particular point. No attempt has been made to incorporate factual information or interpret primary and secondary sources.

Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections which illuminate thesis Argument is clear and usually flows logically and makes sense. Some evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to evidence are made.

Examples used to support most points. Sentence structure and grammar strong despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems in mechanics. Excellent transitions from point to point.
History essay rubric college

Some evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. May not address counter-arguments or make any connections with the thesis. Analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis adequate but unevenly developed. Good grasp of general historical issues raised by topic. Excellent transitions from point to point. Correct word usage, punctuation, sentence structure, and grammar; correct citation of sources; minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices.
  • Business plan outline sample;
  • How to write an influential person essay;
  • Cheap cheap essay editing service for college;
  • Peer reviewed medical articles;
Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Simplistic view of topic, and there is no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Logic may often fail, or the argument may often be unclear. Some specific examples demonstrate knowledge of relevant history; some clearly relevant examples omitted. Too incoherent to determine. Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent.

The following rubric describes levels of competence in completing an write on a history exam college homework assignment other than a research paper. Level 4 Well-developed rubric directly addressing the topic. Persuasive analysis of research topic, addressing all parts of the topic; analysis demonstrates twos company threes a crowd essay help understanding of all sides of a question as how. Outstanding grasp of essay historical best a4 writing paper raised assignment topic. Numerous specific examples history detailed knowledge of relevant history.
  • Child poverty in britain essay writing;
  • College student stress essays;
  • Essay writing jobs online philippines home-based;
  • Lesson plan for college essay writing;
Quotations may be poorly integrated into sentences. Well written in appropriate standard English; few grammatical errors or colloquialisms. The following rubric describes levels of competence in completing an essay on a history exam or homework assignment other than a research paper.

Descriptive rather than analytical; marginally related to the topic; significant logical gaps. Some specific examples demonstrate knowledge of relevant history; some clearly relevant examples omitted. Few or weak transitions, and there are many paragraphs without topic sentences. Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no particular point. Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or rubric insight or originality. Assignment contains vague collegeappears unoriginal, or offers relatively little that is new; provides little how which to write the paper. Difficult to identify and may blend restatement of obvious history. Has no identifiable thesis essay an utterly incompetent thesis. Shows research minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment.

Level 4 Well-developed thesis directly addressing the topic. Extremely well organized, with a clear introduction, argument, and conclusion. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections which illuminate thesis Argument is clear and usually flows logically and makes sense. Factual information is incorporated. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no particular point.
History essay rubric college

.

.

History essay rubric college
Logic may often fail, or the argument may often be unclear. Some grasp of general historical issues raised by topic, though some significant issues may be omitted. Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around.

.

  • The passing of grandison essay writing;
  • Dissertation report on dematerialisation of shares;
  • Manufactured landscapes essay help;
  • Steve jobs stanford commencement speech 2005 essay help;
General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no particular point. Transitions confusing and unclear. Unclear contains vague terms , appears unoriginal, or offers relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper. Quotations are integrated well into sentences.

.

.

  • Share

Feedback

Mojas

Some factual information is incorporated. Multiple errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May also contain logical contradictions. Well organized, with an introduction, argument, and conclusion. Difficult to identify and may blend restatement of obvious point.

Grosho

Has no identifiable thesis or an utterly incompetent thesis. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems in mechanics. Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking insight or originality. Persuasive analysis of the topic, addressing all parts of the topic; analysis demonstrates thorough understanding of all sides of a question as appropriate. Some evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Well organized, with an introduction, argument, and conclusion.

Meztiramar

Contains at least two of the following: introduction, argument, and conclusion; organization may be somewhat unclear. Huge problems in sentence structure and grammar. Few or weak transitions, and there are many paragraphs without topic sentences. No evidence structure or organization. Several specific examples demonstrate good knowledge of relevant history. Has no identifiable thesis or an utterly incompetent thesis.

Narg

Some specific examples demonstrate knowledge of relevant history; some clearly relevant examples omitted. Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument. May have many more than five run-on sentences, sentence fragments, and comma splices.

Zulkirn

Shows obviously minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment.

Tamuro

Some evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Poorly organized: no clear introduction, argument, or conclusion. Some specific examples demonstrate knowledge of relevant history; some clearly relevant examples omitted. Difficult to identify and may blend restatement of obvious point. Sentence structure and grammar strong despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. The following rubric describes levels of competence in completing an essay on a history exam or homework assignment other than a research paper.

Sarr

Difficult to identify and may blend restatement of obvious point. Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Descriptive rather than analytical; marginally related to the topic; significant logical gaps. Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Some evidence does not support point or may appear where inappropriate.

Zulurr

Good analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis demonstrates understanding of all sides of a question as appropriate , though may be unevenly developed. Analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis adequate but unevenly developed. May not address counter-arguments or make any connections with the thesis. Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent.

LEAVE A COMMENT